Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 25;98(3):456–472. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.12.022

Table 2.

Performance of Natural Selection Statistic in Subsampled Data

Locus SNP Sample Size
Full Dataset 1k 2k 5k 10k 20k 50k
LCT rs6754311 2.15 × 10−25 4.91 × 10−17 2.97 × 10−20 1.53 × 10−23 1.17 × 10−24 2.63 × 10−25 1.02 × 10−26
rs4988235 1.15 × 10−27 7.44 × 10−17 9.80 × 10−20 4.64 × 10−23 3.11 × 10−24 2.69 × 10−25 1.62 × 10−27
rs17346504 8.41 × 10−7 2.86 × 10−2 1.25 × 10−2 9.49 × 10−4 6.03 × 10−5 8.12 × 10−6 9.80 × 10−7
ADH1B rs1229984 1.26 × 10−13 3.91 × 10−9 3.51 × 10−11 1.97 × 10−12 5.54 × 10−13 1.50 × 10−13 1.31 × 10−13
IRF4 rs12203592 5.52 × 10−55 3.15 × 10−6 9.18 × 10−12 7.47 × 10−25 7.21 × 10−36 7.02 × 10−45 2.19 × 10−54
HLA rs382259 5.38 × 10−13 8.68 × 10−9 1.23 × 10−10 7.07 × 10−12 1.85 × 10−12 7.51 × 10−13 5.77 × 10−13
rs9268628 8.66 × 10−18 3.62 × 10−5 3.41 × 10−7 5.97 × 10−12 2.10 × 10−14 2.68 × 10−16 1.00 × 10−17
rs4394275 9.36 × 10−12 8.40 × 10−2 1.94 × 10−3 1.44 × 10−5 4.00 × 10−8 7.86 × 10−10 1.24 × 10−11
IGFBP3 rs150353309 5.82 × 10−12 5.90 × 10−4 1.49 × 10−5 2.72 × 10−8 3.61 × 10−10 3.34 × 10−11 6.61 × 10−12
IGH rs34614900 5.23 × 10−9 6.33 × 10−3 2.24 × 10−4 2.26 × 10−6 2.01 × 10−7 3.32 × 10−8 5.32 × 10−9
OCA2 rs12916300 2.80 × 10−13 6.29 × 10−6 1.07 × 10−7 3.67 × 10−9 1.94 × 10−11 5.29 × 10−12 3.11 × 10−13
rs2703951 5.11 × 10−7 1.12 × 10−1 2.45 × 10−2 7.96 × 10−4 7.17 × 10−5 4.52 × 10−6 5.74 × 10−7
TLR1 rs5743611 5.42 × 10−8 8.05 × 10−3 4.27 × 10−4 9.41 × 10−6 1.19 × 10−6 2.17 × 10−7 5.60 × 10−8
rs4833095 6.52 × 10−7 6.07 × 10−4 3.37 × 10−4 7.35 × 10−5 3.64 × 10−5 6.03 × 10−6 7.10 × 10−7
SLC45A2 rs16891982 6.89 × 10−8 8.25 × 10−4 2.17 × 10−4 1.93 × 10−5 4.55 × 10−6 2.46 × 10−7 7.31 × 10−8

The selection statistic was computed in random subsets of individuals of specified size for each SNP in Table 1 (except for the chromosome 8 inversion region) and the known selection regions TLR174 and SLC45A276 in Table S4. We report the median selection statistic p value across 100 random subsets.