Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 11;6:24285. doi: 10.1038/srep24285

Table 1. Effect of B. pilosa on body weight and composition of ICR mice.

Groups Initial BW (g) Final BW (g) Body composition
Crude protein (%) Crude fat (%)
Males
 0% BP 32.9 ± 2.1 51.6 ± 3.0 14.2 ± 1.3 19.4 ± 2.0
 0.5% BP 32.3 ± 1.5 50.7 ± 3.1 15.3 ± 1.3* 17.8 ± 3.1*
 1.5% BP 31.2 ± 1.5 52.1 ± 2.3 19.6 ± 1.5** 13.9 ± 2.2**
 2.5% BP 32.2 ± 1.1 50.1 ± 3.6 19.3 ± 1.0** 12.8 ± 1.7**
Females
 0% BP 24.1 ± 1.4 36.1 ± 1.9 12.2 ± 1.1 22.8 ± 3.1
 0.5% BP 23.8 ± 1.3 36.8 ± 2.6 13.5 ± 1.7* 20.5 ± 2.7*
 1.5% BP 23.1 ± 0.9 36.5 ± 2.1 13.7 ± 1.8* 18.6 ± 2.0*
 2.5% BP 23.5 ± 1.0 37.3 ± 2.8 14.3 ± 1.5** 16.5 ± 1.7**

Four groups of 5-week-old ICR males and females were fed standard diet and standard diet containing 0.5% B. pilosa extract (BP), 1.5% BP, and 2.5% BP for 24 wk. Body weight and composition were measured. The body composition including crude protein and fat were calculated as percentages in the dried carcass mass. The data from 5 mice per group are expressed as mean ± SEM. ANOVA was used to analyze the statistical significance. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 are considered to be statistically significant when compared with control group (0% BP).