Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 11;6:24276. doi: 10.1038/srep24276

Figure 6. The total amount of collected water on test tube type condensers during 90 minutes in fog harvesting and dew harvesting.

Figure 6

In fog harvesting, the water repellent surfaces have the larger amount of the collected water due to the higher water removal efficiency. On the other hand, in dew harvesting, the hydrophilic surface (Bare) shows the best harvesting performance due to its higher nucleation rate.