Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Nov 23;63(12):2563–2571. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13818

Table 2.

Clinical Heterogeneity of Studies in Review

Characteristic n (%)
Definition of “elderly”
 60   1 (5)
 61   1 (5)
 65   6 (30)
 70   7 (35)
 80   5 (25)
Number of age groups defined as “elderly”
 1   5 (25)
 2   9 (45)
 3   3 (15)
 4   2 (10)
 6   1 (5)
Procedure type
 Major abdominal procedurea   5 (25)
 Colon, malignant   5 (25)
 Colon, mixed benign and malignantb   5 (25)
 Colon, benign   3 (15)
 Perforated peptic ulcer   1 (5)
 Diagnosis of acute abdomen   1 (5)
 Included elective cases for comparison   6 (30)
Method for defining “emergency” cases
 Standardized database definitions   7 (35)
 After nonelective admission   5 (25)
 Within 12, 24, or 72 hours of admission   2 (10)
 Defined by disease process   2 (10)
 Defined emergence by surgeon   1 (5)
 No specific definition provided   3 (15)
 Included younger individuals for comparison 12 (60)
Age range of “younger” comparison participantsc
 16–39   1 (8)
 16–64   1 (8)
 17–69   1 (8)
 18–50   1 (8)
 18–55   1 (8)
 18–69   1 (8)
 18–79   1 (8)
 20–64   1 (8)
 23–69   1 (8)
 <70d   1 (8)
 <80d   1 (8)
 65–79e   1 (8)
Mortality measuref
 In-patient   5 (25)
 30-day 15 (75)
 1-year   3 (15)
 >1-year   1 (1)
a

Including exploratory laparotomy.

b

Proportion of malignant cases ranged from 18% to 54%.

c

n = 12.

d

Lower age bound not defined.

e

Older comparison group age >79.

f

Because each study may have had more than one mortality measure, these proportions add up to more than 100%.