Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 1;22(4):315–322. doi: 10.1089/acm.2015.0244

Table 3.

Potential Factors Related to Acupuncture Preference (Reference, Not Preferred Acupuncture) (n = 566)

Factors Reference Odds ratio (95% CI) p-Value
No. of CAM modalities used   0.61 (0.52–0.71) <0.001
Women Men 0.66 (0.32–1.36) 0.266
Region of United States Northeast    
 Midwest   0.16 (0.06–0.40) <0.001
 South   0.57 (0.21–1.53) 0.266
 West   0.38 (0.18–0.80) 0.011
Race/ethnicity Hispanic    
 Non-Hispanic white   1.25 (0.62–2.53) 0.532
 Non-Hispanic black   0.60 (0.22–1.59) 0.303
 Non-Hispanic Asian   1.79 (0.42–7.73) 0.432
 Non-Hispanic other   0.42 (0.47–3.77) 0.437
Education High school graduate or lessa    
 Bachelor degree   1.29 (0.62–2.70) 0.740
 Master degree and higher   0.85 (0.35–2.04) 0.716
Marital status/relationship Married or living with a partner    
 Divorced or separated   0.86 (0.37–1.99) 0.720
 Widowed   0.53 (0.20–1.38) 0.192
 Never married   0.82 (0.39–1.67) 0.175
Dental pain No dental pain 0.53 (0.25–1.13) 0.100
Digestive allergy No digestive allergy 1.29 (0.48–3.48) 0.605
Skin problems other than eczema/allergies No skin problems 0.64 (0.30–1.36) 0.248
Sore throat No sore throat 0.90 (0.65–1.25) 0.546
a

Because of the limited number of participants in the less than high school education group, participants in this group were combined with the high school graduate group as the reference to logistic regression.