Table 3.
De novo assemblers.
| NAME | SUPPORTED TECHNOLOGY | ASSEMBLY COVERAGE | ERROR RATE | REFERENCES |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABySS | Solexa, SOLiD | 95.6% | 1 per 8 kbp | 66 |
| Celera | Solexa, Sanger, 454 | 95.23% | 1 per 17 kbp | 200 |
| Edena | Illumina | 95.11% | 1 per 4 kbp | 201 |
| Euler | Sanger, 454, Solexa | 92.78% | 1 per 2 kbp | 202 |
| Forge | 454, Solexa, SOLID, Sanger | 93.67% | 1 per 6 kbp | 203 |
| MIRA | Sanger, Illumina, 454 | 94.48% | 1 per 8kbp | 200 |
| PASHA | Illumina | 93.17% | 1 per 7 kbp | 204 |
| SGA | Illumina, Sanger, 454, Ion Torrent | 95.9% | 1 per 83 kbp | 66 |
| SOAPdenovo | Solexa | 94.8% | 1 per 81 kbp | 66 |
| Velvet | Sanger, 454, Solexa, SOLiD | 94.5% | 1 per 18 kbp | 66 |
Notes: The coverage and error rate were measured by different studies under different conditions; therefore, the comparison might not be considered at quantitative level.