Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 11;11(4):e0153217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153217

Table 3. Incidence rates (IRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) of tuberculosis (TB) disease by biologic exposure with csDMARDs-exposed patients as reference group, and by isoniazid prophylaxis therapy (INHP) with the absence of INHP as reference group.

TB cases/py Crude IR per100000 py Crude HR(95%CI) Adjusted HR (95% CI)
csDMARDs-exposed 913/231,759 394 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 INHP (-)(n = 36,148)# 913/231,697 394 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 INHP (+) (n = 14) 0/62 0 NA NA
Adalimumab-exposed 67/11,171 600 1.52(1.19–1.95)** 1.52(1.18–1.96)*
 INHP (-) (n = 1,615)# 66/10,713 616 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 INHP (+) (n = 63) 1/459 218 0.35(0.05–2.50) 0.45(0.06–3.24)
Etanercept-exposed 121/27,367 442 1.14(0.94–1.37) 1.16(0.95–1.41)
 INHP (-) (n = 3,508)# 121/26,880 450 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 INHP (+) (n = 69) 0/487 0 NA NA
Rituximab-exposed 2/6,179 32 0.08(0.02–0.34)** 0.08(0.02–0.31)**
 INHP (-) (n = 755)# 2/6,119 33 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 INHP (+) (n = 8) 0/60 0 NA NA

# Not indicative of total number of patients without latent tuberculosis infection

csDMARDs: conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; py: person-years; IR: incidence rate; HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; NA: not applicable; INHP(+): with isoniazid prophylaxis; INHP(+): without isoniazid prophylaxis. Adjusted HR estimated from multivariate Cox proportional hazard models comparing each biologic to csDMARDspropensity score adjusted for age, sex, the use of corticosteroids (daily dose≧5mg), and Charlson comorbidity index.

* p<0.005,

** p<0.001, versus tsDMARDs-exposed patients