Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 7;9:2081–2088. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S95414

Table 1.

Correlation between HOTTIP expression and different clinicopathological features in patients with gastric cancer

Characteristics High HOTTIP expression (%) Low HOTTIP expression (%) P-value
Age (years)
 ≥60 34 (47.9) 37 (52.1) 0.652
 <60 15 (55.6) 12 (44.4)
Sex
 Male 26 (46.4) 30 (53.6) 0.541
 Female 23 (54.8) 19 (45.2)
Differentiation
 Well-moderate 12 (40.0) 18 (60.0) 0.273
 Poor 37 (54.4) 31 (45.6)
Lauren type
 Intestinal 27 (43.5) 35 (56.5) 0.142
 Diffuse and mixed 22 (61.1) 14 (38.9)
Tumor size
 ≥5 cm 36 (61.0) 23 (39.0) 0.006
 <5 cm 13 (33.3) 26 (66.7)
Invasion depth
 T1, T2 14 (36.8) 24 (63.2) 0.031
 T3, T4 35 (58.3) 25 (41.7)
TNM stage
 I/II 11 (33.3) 22 (66.7) 0.013
 III 38 (58.5) 27 (41.5)
Lymphatic metastasis
 Negative 10 (33.3) 20 (66.7) 0.028
 Positive 39 (57.4) 29 (42.6)

Abbreviation: HOTTIP, HOXA transcript at the distal tip.