Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immigr Minor Health. 2016 Apr;18(2):345–352. doi: 10.1007/s10903-015-0186-0

Table II.

Relationship between Perceived Food Environment and Healthy Eating in a Sample of Los Angeles County Residents, LA HANES II, 2012 (n=1,440)a

Variable Incident Rate Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) P value
Focal Independent Variable
Perceived food environment 1.047 (1.007, 1.089) 0.021
Control Variables
Race
Referent: African American/Black ----- -----
Hispanic/Latino 0.968 (0.852, 1.100) 0.612
White/Non-Hispanic 0.810 (0.678, 0.967) 0.020
Other 1.067 (0.899, 1.267) 0.459
Gender
Referent: Female ----- -----
Male 0.911 (0.821, 1.010) 0.077
Education Level
Referent: Less than high school ----- -----
High school graduate 1.052 (0.888, 1.245) 0.559
Some college 0.972 (0.832, 1.137) 0.724
College graduate 0.945 (0.783, 1.140) 0.551
Postgraduate/professional degree 1.293 (0.983, 1.701) 0.066
Age 1.006 (1.002, 1.011) 0.002
Nutritional knowledge 0.976 (0.847, 1.125) 0.740

LA HANES II = the second round of the Los Angeles County Health and Examination Survey.

a

N includes survey participants who reported no missing data on any of the variables included in the multivariable model.