Table 5.
Panel 1: Women (n = 2,728) | |||
---|---|---|---|
b | Exp(b) | 95% CI | |
Total effect | −0.127 | 0.88 | (0.83, 0.94)*** |
Direct effect | −0.114 | 0.89 | (0.84, 0.95)*** |
Indirect effect | −0.013 | 0.99 | (0.98, 0.99)*** |
Confounding ratio | 1.11 | ||
Confounding percentage | 10.24% | ||
Panel 2: Men (n = 1,998) | |||
b | Exp(b) | 95% CI | |
Total effect | −0.175 | 0.84 | (0.79, 0.89) |
Direct effect | −0.149 | 0.86 | (0.81, 0.92) |
Indirect effect | −0.026 | 0.97 | (0.96, 0.99) |
Confounding ratio | 1.17 | ||
Confounding percentage | 14.86% |
Note: 95% CI for Exp(b). All covariates controlled for.
p ≤ .001