Table 2. Percentage of reactive HIV screening tests stratified by sex, age group and key population among individuals tested during 2014 in the CBVCTs participating in the COBATEST networka.
| All | All | Males | Females | <25 | ≥25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Numerator: Number of clients with reactive screening HIV test result | 135 | 73 | 12 | 18 | 71 |
| Denominator: Number of clients tested for HIV with a screening test | 8554 | 6182 | 2370 | 2038 | 6289 |
| Percentage of clients with reactive screening HIV test result | 1.58 | 1.93 | 1.09 | 1.51 | 2.0 |
| MSM | |||||
| Numerator: Number of clients with reactive screening HIV test result | 111 | 111 | – | 27 | 82 |
| Denominator: Number of clients tested for HIV with a screening test | 3546 | 3546 | – | 735 | 2732 |
| Percentage of clients with reactive screening HIV test result | 3.13% | 3.13% | – | 3.67% | 3.00% |
| SW | |||||
| Numerator: Number of clients with reactive screening HIV test result | 29 | 27 | 2 | 9 | 20 |
| Denominator: Number of clients tested for HIV with a screening test | 721 | 351 | 369 | 141 | 570 |
| Percentage of clients with reactive screening HIV test result | 4.02 | 7.69 | 0.54 | 6.38 | 3.51 |
| PWID | |||||
| Numerator: Number of clients with reactive screening HIV test result | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Denominator: Number of clients tested for HIV with a screening test | 134 | 113 | 21 | 17 | 114 |
| Percentage of clients with reactive screening HIV test result | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Migrants | |||||
| Numerator: Number of clients with reactive screening HIV test result | 63 | 48 | 15 | 16 | 46 |
| Denominator: Number of clients tested for HIV with a screening test | 2811 | 1812 | 999 | 646 | 2165 |
| Percentage of clients with reactive screening HIV test result | 2.24 | 2.65 | 1.50 | 2.47 | 2.12 |
PWID, people who inject drugs; MSM, men who have sex with men; SW, sex workers.
Note: Individuals may be members of more than one key population at a time, so the categories are not mutually exclusive.
aOnly data from CBVCTs that used the common data entry tool were included in the analyses.