Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 12;6:24114. doi: 10.1038/srep24114

Figure 4. Two example neuron responses to the intensity and double oddball paradigms.

Figure 4

(A,C) FRAs of the two neurons with intensity and double oddball stimuli, plotted as in Fig. 1A. The insets show the PSTHs for the low-frequency/intensity sound (f1/i1; white circle) presented as standard (blue) or deviant (red) in the frequency oddball condition (Δf = 0.1; Δi = 0; see white diamond). (B) PSTHs showing the responses of examples neuron #1 (panel A) to the low-frequency/intensity deviant sound (f1/i1 dev; red line) in nine different intensity and double oddball paradigms, with frequency separations of Δf = 0, 0.04 and 0.1 (rows) and intensity differences of Δi = 10, 30 and 50 dB (columns). For comparison, the gray lines show the corresponding high-frequency/intensity standard responses (f2/i2 std). (D) PSTHs showing the responses of examples neuron #2 (panel C) to the low-frequency/intensity deviant in nine different intensity and double oddball paradigms. In this case, the frequency separations were Δf = 0, 0.1 and 0.37.