Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):653–660. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0962-9

Table 1.

Results from paired, two-tailed t-tests comparing mean RMSD for the SP and SLAM models. The data sets that were generated with parametric distributions each have 1,000 simulated patients. The data sets that were generated with empirical distributions each have 255 simulated patients.

Data set SP fit
(mean RMSD)
SLAM fit
(mean RMSD)
Preferred
model
p-value
SP_normal 0.0118 0.0124 SP 0.0021
SP_uniform 0.0116 0.0123 SP 0.0006
SP_empirical 0.0099 0.0106 SP 0.00006
SLAM_normal 0.0123 0.0117 SLAM 0.0155
SLAM_uniform 0.0120 0.0116 SLAM 0.0512
SLAM_empirical 0.0105 0.0096 SLAM 0.00004