Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 13.
Published in final edited form as: Radiat Res. 2014 Jun 16;182(1):1–17. doi: 10.1667/RR13413.1

TABLE 5.

Combined Study Data Model Fits and Slope Estimates in Relationship to Occupational and Personal-Diagnostic-Medical (PDM) Doses, by Limiting to Members of Cohort with Specified Level of Dose, using Regression-Calibration Adjusted Occupational Doses, with 95% Profile Likelihood Confidence Intervals, Adjusted for Overdispersiona

Dose range used (mGy) (occupational + personal-diagnostic dose) Occupational linear dose parameter only (translocations/100 CEb/Gy) P valuec PDM linear dose parameter only (translocations/100 CEb/Gy) only P valuec Occupational + PDM linear dose parameter (constrained equal) (translocations/100 CEb/Gy) P valuec
Full 7.0 (1.2, 12.9) 0.0188 4.4 (2.2, 6.7) <0.0001 4.4 (2.5, 6.5) <0.0001
<250 5.9 (–0.3, 12.1) 0.0607 5.0 (2.3, 7.8) 0.0002 5.2 (2.7, 7.7) <0.0001
<200 5.9 (–0.3, 12.1) 0.0620 4.8 (1.9, 7.8) 0.0011 5.1 (2.4, 7.7) 0.0001
<150 6.3 (0.3, 12.4) 0.0411 4.2 (0.6, 7.9) 0.0210 4.8 (1.7, 7.9) 0.0023
<100 9.0 (1.3, 16.7) 0.0225 7.2 (1.5, 13.0) 0.0137 8.4 (3.9, 12.9) 0.0004
<50 –4.9 (–16.5, 7.1) 0.4222 13.4 (3.7, 23.4) 0.0076 8.3 (–0.5, 16.9) 0.0672
a

Background model is adjusted for age, study group (CTS-I vs. II), sex × study group; a 6-year period of latency is assumed.

b

Per whole chromosome equivalents (CE), i.e., the normalized translocation frequency per 100 cells assumed to have full-genome painting done of their nuclear DNA.

c

P value refers to the improvement in fit compared with fit of a model without radiation dose terms.