Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 13.
Published in final edited form as: Radiat Res. 2014 Jun 16;182(1):1–17. doi: 10.1667/RR13413.1

APPENDIX TABLE D1.

CTS-I+II Data Background (Nonradiation) Model Fits and Significance for Translocation, Adjusted for Over-Dispersion

Baseline variables Deviance (df) P valuea
Constant 1006.671 (237) -
Constant, age 973.281 (236) 0.0048
Constant, age, age2 971.190 (235) 0.4776
Constant, age, age2, age3 924.872 (234) 0.0007
Constant, age, age2, age3, age4 912.405 (233) 0.0757
Constant, age, age2, age3, age4, age5 904.471 (232) 0.1550
Constant, age, age2, age3, age4, age5, age6 895.067 (231) 0.1206
Constant, age, age2, age3, age4, age5, age6 age7 895.026 (230) 0.9183
Constant, age, age2, age3, age4, age5, age6, age7, age8 894.777 (229) 0.8009
Constant, age, age2, age3, age4, age5, age6, sex 866.612 (230) 0.0065b
Constant, age, age2, age3, age4, age5, age6, sex, years cigarette smoking 862.105 (229) 0.2750
Constant, age, age2, age3, age4, age5, age6, sex, pack-years cigarette smoking 860.680 (229) 0.2103c
Constant, age, age2, age3, age4, age5, age6, sex, study group (CTS-I vs. II) 831.938 (229) 0.0023c
Constant, study group (CTS-I vs. II) × age, age2, age3, age4, age5, age6, sex, study group 831.786 (228) 0.8384
Constant, study group (CTS-I vs. II) × {age, age2, age3, age4, age5, age6}, sex, study group 806.857 (223) 0.2335
Constant, age, age2, age3, age4, age5, age6, sex, study group (CTS-I vs. II), sex × study group 818.019 (228) 0.0501d
Constant, age, study group (CTS-I vs. II), sex × study group 822.928 (233) 0.9272e
Constant, study group (CTS-I vs. II), sex × study group 954.514 (234) <0.0001f
Constant, age, study group (CTS-I vs. II) 852.222 (235) 0.0296f
Constant, age, sex 927.694 (235) <0.0001f

Note. Optimal model shown in boldface.

a

Unless otherwise indicated the P value refers to the improvement in fit of that line with the model in the line immediately above it in the table.

b

P value of improvement in fit of this line of table compared with fit of a model with age,. . ., age6.

c

P value of improvement in fit of this line of table compared with fit of a model with age,. . ., age6, sex.

d

P value of improvement in fit of this line of table compared with fit of a model with age,. . ., age6, sex, study group (CTS-I vs. II).

e

P value of improvement in fit of a model with age,. . ., age6, sex, study group (CTS-I vs II), sex study group over a model with age, sex, study group, sex study group.

f

P value of deterioration of fit of this line of Table compared with fit of a model with age, sex, study group (CTS-I vs. II), sex × study group in the background.