Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 7;4:e1855. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1855

Table 3. Genetic diversity in cacaos from Soconusco (Chiapas, Mexico) grouped by the geographic approach (Pop) and genetic origin approach.

Pop Locality N S Sn H Hd πd
1 Huehuetán, Tapachula 5 2 1 3 0.70 ± 0.21 0.0019 ± 0.0017
2 Cacahoatán, Tuxtla Chico 3 2 1 2 0.67 ± 0.31 0.0026 ± 0.0026
3 Frontera Hidalgo, Suchiate 5 5 0 3 0.70 ± 0.21 0.0042 ± 0.0032
4 Mazatán 6 5 3 5 0.93 ± 0.12 0.0048 ± 0.0035
5 Mapastepec, Villa Comaltitlán 9 5 0 4 0.69 ± 0.14 0.0039 ± 0.0027
6 Yucatán 2 1 1 2 1.00 ± 0.50 0.0019 ± 0.0027
7 Selva Lacandona 3 0 0 1 0 0
Total 33 6
Mean ± sd 0.66 ± 0.08 0.0032 ± 0.0021
Genetic origin approach*
“Criollo” 12 6 1 4 0.64 ± 0.13 0.0025 ± 0.0019
“Non-Criollo” 11 5 1 5 0.62 ± 0.16 0.0030 ± 0.0021
“Admixtures” 5 5 1 5 1.00 ± 0.12 0.0060 ± 0.0041
Criollo-referencea 8 4 1 5 0.79 ± 0.15 0.0033 ± 0.0025
Forastero-referencea 5 3 0 3 0.80 ± 0.16 0.0031 ± 0.0025
Trinitario-referencea 4 4 0 2 0.50 ± 0.27 0.0038 ± 0.0032
Total 45 4
Mean ± sd 0.80 ± 0.05 0.0038 ± 0.0024

Notes.

N
Samples sizes
S
Number of segregating
Sn
Singletons
H
Number of haplotypes
Hd
Haplotype diversity
πd
Nucleotide diversity
sd
standard deviation
a

Including sequences GenBank (Criollo-reference n = 1, Forastero-reference n = 3, Trinitario-reference n = 3).

*

Classification based on membership (>90%) to Criollo type, see Table 1 (Vázquez-Ovando et al., 2014).