Table 2.

Percent signal change in ROI analysis results for the CCN, DAN, and DMN, defined from the Yeo 7-network parcellation

Region of interest	Hemisphere	LTM-guided	STIM-guided	t-value	P-value
Cognitive control network
PrC-p	L	0.28 ± 0.05	0.13 ± 0.05	5.04	0.0012
PrC-p	R	0.30 ± 0.04	0.13 ± 0.04	6.84	<0.0001
CaS-p	L	0.20 ± 0.04	0.14 ± 0.03	5.98	0.0001
CaS-p	R	0.24 ± 0.03	0.17 ± 0.03	4.46	0.0043
latIPS	L	0.16 ± 0.04	0.12 ± 0.04	1.62	1.00
latIPS	R	0.17 ± 0.05	0.13 ± 0.04	1.79	1.00
LTC-p	L	0.02 ± 0.06	0.08 ± 0.06	2.06	0.725
LTC-p	R	0.08 ± 0.04	0.09 ± 0.04	0.55	1.00
dmPFC-p	L	0.06 ± 0.03	0.05 ± 0.03	0.57	1.00
dmPFC-p	R	0.11 ± 0.03	0.08 ± 0.03	1.39	1.00
dlPFC	L	0.04 ± 0.03	0.02 ± 0.03	0.838	1.00
dlPFC	R	0.07 ± 0.03	0.05 ± 0.03	0.814	1.00
vlPFC-p	L	0.17 ± 0.04	0.18 ± 0.04	0.218	1.00
vlPFC-p	R	0.19 ± 0.05	0.20 ± 0.04	0.777	1.00
Dorsal attention network
IPS/SPL	L	0.24 ± 0.04	0.37 ± 0.04	6.54	<0.0001
IPS/SPL	R	0.22 ± 0.04	0.36 ± 0.04	6.81	<0.0001
iPCS	L	0.18 ± 0.04	0.31 ± 0.04	4.51	0.0029
iPCS	R	0.25 ± 0.05	0.43 ± 0.05	6.12	<0.0001
sPCS	L	0.20 ± 0.04	0.26 ± 0.04	3.83	0.0144
sPCS	R	0.18 ± 0.04	0.27 ± 0.04	4.77	0.0016
Default mode network
PHC	L	0.04 ± 0.03	0.17 ± 0.04	6.92	<0.0001
PHC	R	0.07 ± 0.04	0.25 ± 0.04	7.34	<0.0001
Hippo.	L	0.007 ± 0.02	0.067 ± 0.03	3.53	0.0265
Hippo.	R	−0.004 ± 0.03	0.091 ± 0.02	6.35	<0.0001
PCC	L	0.01 ± 0.03	−0.04 ± 0.03	4.80	0.0021
PCC	R	0.06 ± 0.03	0.02 ± 0.03	3.61	0.0308
dmPFC-a	L	−0.09 ± 0.03	−0.11 ± 0.03	2.41	0.2729
dmPFC-a	R	−0.07 ± 0.03	−0.09 ± 0.03	2.11	0.4647
vlPFC-a	L	−0.10 ± 0.04	−0.06 ± 0.03	2.62	0.1863
vlPFC-a	R	−0.06 ± 0.03	−0.01 ± 0.03	2.81	0.1329
AnG	L	−0.06 ± 0.04	−0.07 ± 0.04	1.06	0.6712
AnG	R	−0.06 ± 0.03	−0.03 ± 0.03	1.92	0.6096
LTC-a	L	−0.02 ± 0.03	−0.02 ± 0.03	0.68	1.0
LTC-a	R	−0.04 ± 0.02	−0.03 ± 0.03	0.58	1.0

Note: All significant values are Holm–Bonferroni corrected for 34 comparisons (total number of ROIs).