Table 1.
EC50 (mM) | Emax (%) | n | |
---|---|---|---|
Controls | 2.2 ± 0.04 | 96 ± 3.4 | 8 |
-Endothelium | − | − | 8 |
+ Calhex-231 (μM) | 4 ± 0.51⁎⁎⁎⁎ | 54.6 ± 4.6⁎⁎ | 4 |
+ L-NAME (300 μM) | 4.1 ± 0.01⁎⁎⁎⁎ | 8.3 ± 11⁎⁎⁎⁎ | 7 |
+ ODQ (10 μM) | 3.1. ± 0.59⁎⁎⁎ | 30.8 ± 14⁎⁎⁎ | 4 |
+ KT5283 (1 μM) | 4.5 ± 0.42⁎⁎⁎ | 53.4 ± 12⁎⁎ | 4 |
+ IbTx (100 nM) | 4.3 ± 0.21⁎⁎⁎⁎ | 51.9 ± 5.1⁎⁎⁎ | 4 |
+ IbTx (100 nM) + CbTx (100 nM) | 5.1 ± 0.03⁎⁎⁎⁎ | 15 ± 11.7⁎⁎⁎⁎ | 5 |
+ IbTX (200 nM) | 4.1 ± 0.34⁎⁎⁎⁎ | 45 ± 7.2⁎⁎⁎ | 5 |
+ Apamin (100 nM) | 2.1 ± 0.01 | 93 ± 3.3 | 4 |
+ Linopirdine (10 μM) | 2.1 ± 0.22 | 72 ± 3.3⁎⁎ | 4 |
+ Indomethacin(10 μM) | 2.3 ± 0.05 | 92 ± 3.5 | 5 |
+ Glibenclamide | 2.1 ± 0.31 | 91 ± 4.6 | 4 |
+ L-NAME (300 μM) + CbTx(100 nM) | − | − | 5 |
EC50 and Emax values were compared with Student's t-test vs. corresponding controls. n = animals used, with at least 3 vessel segments per animal.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.
p < 0.0001.