. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 13.

Published in final edited form as: Genet Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;34(5):434–443. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20496

TABLE II.

2-patterns that passed the p_nfp0.2 threshold

Permutation null group	Pattern	−log₁₀P	OR
No significant sub-combinations	^*ANGPT1_R_8=C/C CNTNAP5_500=C/T	6.30	2.84
	^*ANGPT1_R_8=C/C ABC1_17=A/A	6.09	2.05
	^*ANGPT1_R_3=T/T CNTNAP5_500=C/T	6.30	2.84
	^*ANGPT1_R_3=T/T ABC1_17=A/A	6.21	2.06
	ALOX5_R_9=C/T CDKN2A_501=G/G	5.93	2.37
	ALOX5_R_9=C/T CNTNAP5_500=C/T	6.91	2.43
ALOX5_R_501	ALOX5_R_501=A/C CDKN2A_501=G/G	6.19	2.41
ALOX5_R_501	ALOX5_R_501=A/C CNTNAP5_500=C/T	6.91	2.43
Others	None

The patterns in bold font have a AMEP corrected p-values of less than 0.05.

indicates subpatterns of the injected signal.