Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 16;468:383–396. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1876-7

Table 1.

Prevalence of RAS mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Study Detection method RAS mutation prevalence
KRAS NRAS Total
Exon 2 Exon 3 Exon 4 Exon 2 Exon 3 Exon 4
PRIME [14] TheraScreen 40 % 4 %a 6 % 3 % 4 %a 0 % 52 %a
20050408 [19] DxS/Qiagen/NGS/Sanger 42 % 2 %a NS 5 %a NS NS
20050408 (updated) [26] NGS/Sanger + WAVE/SURVEYOR® 43 % 5 %a 5 % 4 % 3 %a 1 % NS
20050181 [25] DxS/Qiagen/NGS/Sanger 45 % 4 % 8 % 2 % 6 % 0 % 58 %
PICCOLO [27] Pyrosequencing NAb NAb 4 %c 6 %a NS NS
PEAK [18] Therascreen + WAVE/SURVEYOR® NAd 4 % 7 % 5 % 6 % 0 % NS
CRYSTAL [10] LightMix 36 % NS NS NS NS NS NS
CRYSTAL (updated) [28] BEAMing 37 % 3 % 5 % 4 % 3 % 2 % 43 %
COIN [29] Pyrosequencing 43 %a NS 4 %a,e NS NS
FIRE-3 [30] Pyrosequencing NAd 4 % 5 % 4 % 2 % 0 % NS
OPUS [31] BEAMing NAd 6 % 9 % 7 % 5 % 1 % NS

BEAM beads, emulsions, amplification, and magnetics, NGS next-generation sequencing, NS not specified, PCR polymerase chain reaction

aNot including codon 59

bStudy population limited to patients with KRAS (exon 2 and exon 3 codon 61) wild-type tumors

cNot including codon 117

dStudy population limited to patients with KRAS (exon 2) wild-type tumors

eNot including codon 13