Table 4.
Diet-to-tissue trophic discrimination factors (TDF) of carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios (Δ13C and Δ15N, ‰) from this and other studies on captive- held (captive or rehabilitated) marine carnivores. All values are separated by species and tissue, and Δ13C values are further separated into estimates obtained from bulk or lipid-corrected/extracted prey (LC). Predator samples were lipid extracted prior to the calculation of the TDF are marked with an asterisk (*). All values are given as mean ± SD (as available). Sample sizes (n) are provided for reference.
| Species | Whisker | RBC | Plasma | Serum | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Δ13C NLC |
Δ13C LE | Δ15N | Δ13C NLC | Δ13C LC | Δ15N | Δ13C NLC |
Δ13C LC | Δ15N | Δ13C NLC | Δ13C LC | Δ15N | ||
| This study: | ||||||||||||||
| Monk seal | 1 | +3.9 | +2.7 | +2.6 | +2.9 | +1.4 | +2.2 | +2.8 | +1.1 | +3.1 | --- | --- | --- | |
| Elephant seal | 1 | +4.1 | +3.5 | +2.8 | +1.7 ± 0.2j | +1.1±0.2j | +3.1 ± 0.7j | +2.3 | +1.7 | +3.8 | +2.1 | +1.5 | +4.0 | |
| Bearded seal | 1 | +4.4 | +2.6 | +3.0 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +2.2 | +0.8 | +4.3 | |
| Ringed seal#1 | 1 | +4.6 | +3.9 | +3.0 | +2.3 | +1.6 | +2.7 | +1.8 | +1.2 | +4.1 | --- | --- | --- | |
| Ringed seal #2 | 1 | +4.4 | +3.8 | +3.2 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| Spotted seal#1 | 1 | +4.3 | +3.7 | +4.0 | +2.2 | +1.5 | +2.8 | +1.7 | +1.1 | +4.0 | --- | --- | --- | |
| Spotted seal#2 | 1 | +4.3 | +3.7 | +3.9 | +2.2 | +1.6 | +3.3 | +2.0 | +1.4 | +4.1 | --- | --- | --- | |
| Harbor seal | 1 | +4.4 | +3.4 | +3.4 | +2.1 | +1.6 | +2.6 | +1.8 | +1.2 | +3.9 | --- | --- | --- | |
| California sea lion | 1 | --- | --- | --- | +3.2 | +1.9 | +3.2 | +2.8 | +1.5 | +4.2 | +2.6k | +1.1k | +4.3k | |
| Other studies: | ||||||||||||||
| Harbor seala | 4 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | −0.6 to +1.7 | +3.9 to +4.6 | |
| Harbor sealb | 11 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +1.5±0.9* | --- | +3.8±0.5*l | |
| Harbor sealb | 102 | --- | --- | --- | +1.8* | --- | +3.2*l | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| Harbor sealc | 3 | --- | --- | --- | --- | +1.6 | +2.0i | --- | --- | --- | --- | +0.8 | +3.5i | |
| Harbor sealc | 3 | --- | --- | --- | --- | +1.2 | +1.5i | --- | --- | --- | --- | +0.6 | +2.7i | |
| Harbor sealc | 4 | --- | --- | --- | --- | +1.1 | +2.0i | --- | --- | --- | --- | +0.7 | +2.7i | |
| Harbor, harp, ringed seald | 7 | --- | +3.2±0.2 | +2.8±0.1i | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| Harbor, harp, ringed seald | 14 | --- | --- | --- | --- | +1.7±0.1 | 1.7±0.1i | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| Harp sealc | 8 | --- | --- | --- | --- | +1.7 | +1.7i | --- | --- | --- | --- | +0.8 | +3.3i | |
| Gray sealc | 5 | --- | --- | --- | --- | +1.7 | +1.7i | --- | --- | --- | --- | +1.0 | +3.4i | |
| Gray sealc | 2 | --- | --- | --- | --- | +1.2 | +1.6i | --- | --- | --- | --- | +0.5 | +2.9i | |
| Northern fur seale | 6 | --- | --- | --- | --- | +1.4 | +4.1i | --- | +1.0 | +5.2i | --- | +0.6 | +5.2i | |
| South American sea lionf | 2 | --- | --- | --- | --- | +0.2±0.1* | +2.0±0.1 | --- | +1.0±0.1* | +2.4±0.2 | --- | +1.0±0.1* | +2.6±0.3 | |
| Steller sea liong | 4 | +6.5±0.3 | +3.3±0.3 | +3.7±0.3 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| Southern sea otterh | 5 | +2.4±0.2 | +2.8±0.2 | +5.5±0.2 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
Zhao et al.[17];
Germain et al.[29];
Lesage et al.[15];
Hobson et al.[6];
Kurle[16];
Drago et al.[18];
Stricker et al.[19];
Tyrrell et al.[36]
Lipid extracted prey samples were used for calculation of Δ15N values
The TDF was estimated using the average offset between the δ13C and δ15N values in whiskers and RBCs in free ranging northern elephant seals collected upon return to the colony from a foraging trip (the present study)
Serum samples were collected twice, approximately one year apart and used to calculate an average TDF
Samples were collected from rehabilitated animals