Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 14;6:24497. doi: 10.1038/srep24497

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Comparisons of measured and predicted CCN concentrations by (a) BI and SI methods at SS of 0.1% and BE and SE methods at SS of 0.45%, (b) BI and BE methods at SS of 0.1% and SI and SE methods at SS of 0.45%, (c) AH and SE methods at SS of 0.2% and 0.45%, (d) BI and BE methods for weather-pollution types 1 and 3 (mist and heavy mist) at SS of 0.1%, and SI and SE methods for weather types 2 and 4 (haze and heavy haze) at SS of 0.28% respectively. The data were fitted by least squares fitting.