Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 14;6:24528. doi: 10.1038/srep24528

Table 2. PGLS models with manipulation complexity as response variable and brain size as explanatory variables, terrestriality and diet quality as covariates singly and as combined models (n = 34, Homo sapiens excluded).

Model P-value model λ adj. r2 AIC ∆AIC Predictor variables Estimate Std. error P-value
model 1 <0.001 0 0.728 60.773 log brain 1.286 0.387 0.002
log body −0.551 0.312 0.087
terrestriality 0.948 0.328 0.007
model 2 <0.001 0 0.721 62.463 1.690 log brain 1.376 0.429 0.003
log body −0.618 0.346 0.081
terrestriality 0.927 0.335 0.010
log diet quality −0.313 0.607 0.610
model 3 <0.001 0 0.663 67.105 6.332 log brain 1.274 0.430 0.006
log body −0.416 0.343 0.234
model 4 <0.001 0 0.659 68.438 7.665 log brain 1.422 0.474 0.005
log body −0.531 0.376 0.165
log diet quality −0.513 0.666 0.447
model 5 <0.001 0.147 0.567 68.498 7.725 terrestriality 0.863 0.374 0.028
log body 0.439 0.098 <0.001
model 6 <0.001 0.211 0.461 73.783 13.010 log diet quality −0.069 0.659 0.918
log body 0.531 0.101 <0.001

Body mass is always included as covariate.

Significant effects and best-fitting models are highlighted in bold face.