TABLE II.
Comparison with 11 other prostate MR segmentation methods
| Paper | Year | DSC(%) | MAD(mm) | Time(s) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klein [10] | 2008 | 85.0–88.0 | - | 900 | automatic |
| Gao [38] | 2010 | 84.0±3.0 | - | - | automatic |
| Martin [16] | 2010 | 84 | 2.4 | 240 | automatic |
| Langerak [13] | 2010 | 87 | - | 480 | automatic |
| Toth [3] | 2012 | 88.0±5.0 | 1.5±0.8 | 150 | automatic |
| Liao [8] | 2013 | 86.7±2.2 | - | - | automatic |
| Xie [14] | 2014 | 86 | - | - | automatic |
| Guo [18] | 2014 | 89.1±3.6 | - | 60–120 | automatic |
| Qiu [9] | 2014 | (89.2–89.3)±(3.2–3.3) | (3.2–3.3)±(0.8–1.0) | 50 | semi-automatic |
| Qiu [4] | 2014 | 88.5±3.5 | 1.8±0.8 | 5 | semi-automatic |
| Korsager [15] | 2015 | 88 | - | - | semi-automatic |
| Ours | 2015 | 89.3±1.9 | 1.6±0.3 | 35 | semi-automatic |