. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Oct 30;35(3):791–801. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2496296

TABLE II.

Comparison with 11 other prostate MR segmentation methods

Paper	Year	DSC(%)	MAD(mm)	Time(s)	Type
Klein [10]	2008	85.0–88.0	-	900	automatic
Gao [38]	2010	84.0±3.0	-	-	automatic
Martin [16]	2010	84	2.4	240	automatic
Langerak [13]	2010	87	-	480	automatic
Toth [3]	2012	88.0±5.0	1.5±0.8	150	automatic
Liao [8]	2013	86.7±2.2	-	-	automatic
Xie [14]	2014	86	-	-	automatic
Guo [18]	2014	89.1±3.6	-	60–120	automatic
Qiu [9]	2014	(89.2–89.3)±(3.2–3.3)	(3.2–3.3)±(0.8–1.0)	50	semi-automatic
Qiu [4]	2014	88.5±3.5	1.8±0.8	5	semi-automatic
Korsager [15]	2015	88	-	-	semi-automatic
Ours	2015	89.3±1.9	1.6±0.3	35	semi-automatic