Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Ceram Int. 2016 May 15;42(7):9214–9221. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.018

Table 2.

Comparison among studies that evaluated different slow cooling methods.

Author, year (Ref) Label used Description of the cooling rate Porcelain Tg (°C)
Al-Amleh, 2014 [8] Slow Cooling at 20 °C/min from final glaze temperature (725 °C) to 400 °C. IPS e.max ZirPress 530
IPS e.maxCeram 490
Belli, 2013 [9] Slow At final glaze temperature, the door of the furnace was opened only 10%, until the temperature reached 200 °C. VM9 600
Lava Ceram 565
Benetti, 2014 [10] Slow The chamber was kept closed until the furnace reached 50 °C below the Tg. Lava Ceram 557
Vita Omega 900 594
VM9 600
Zirox 570
Lava Ceram 565
Tan, 2012 [14] Slow The specimen was left in the partially (30%) open mufffle for 15 minutes until a mufffle temperature of 500 °C was reached. VM9 600
Mainjot, 2011 [13] Slow Cooling at 2 °C/min in a special furnace (Carbolite LMF 12/2, Carbolite, Hope Valley, UK), from 900 °C to room temperature.
Modified Cooling from 900 °C to 600 °C with furnace closed.
Choi, 2011 [11] Slow The furnace was kept closed from final sintering temperature to 100 °C. Which took approximately 30–40 min depending on the firing cycle used. Vita PM9 640
Normal The furnace was kept closed until temperature drops to the starting temperature of the glazing cycle. IPS e.max Zirpress 530
Wieland Xzr 620
CZR 615