Table 3.
Pairing Type | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment 1 | ||||||
One-Word | −0.053 | −0.037 | −0.021 | 0.014 | 0.081 | 0.16*** |
Two-Word | −0.074* | 0.024 | 0.022 | −0.014 | 0.074* | 0.043 |
Experiment 2 | ||||||
One-Word | 0.024 | −0.025 | 0.071 | 0.031 | 0.023 | 0.22*** |
Two-Word 1st | −0.10* | −0.026 | −0.010 | 0.12* | 0.099 | 0.14** |
Two-Word 2nd | −0.12* | 0.043 | −0.028 | 0.057 | 0.097* | 0.05 |
Experiment 3 | ||||||
One-Language | ||||||
One-Word | 0.026 | −0.0091 | 0.069 | 0.10 | 0.0082 | 0.042 |
Two-Word Cued | −0.0016 | −0.052 | 0.016 | 0.10 | 0.029 | 0.036 |
Two-Word Uncued | −0.14 | 0.13 | −0.029 | 0.047 | −0.074 | 0.084 |
Multiple-Languages | ||||||
One-Word | 0.055 | 0.025 | −0.040 | 0.048 | 0.019 | 0.10 |
Two-Word Cued | 0.0072 | 0.036 | −0.029 | −0.011 | 0.071 | 0.11† |
Two-Word Uncued | −0.088 | 0.077 | −0.091 | 0.099 | −0.013 | 0.23** |
Note: In Experiments 1 and 2, there was no difference in overall performance across the One and Multiple Languages groups, so only the overall data patterns are presented.
p<0.07.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001