Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 14;16:48. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0207-y

Table 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, false positives, and false negatives by evaluator 1, 2 and 3 in relation to VRF occurrence

Evaluator Group Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy False positive False negative
n % n % n % n % n %
1 • Nonfilled 7 87.5 6 75.0 13 81.2 2 25 1 12.5
• Gutta-percha 5 62.5 7 87.5 12 75.0 1 12.5 3 37.5
• Post 6 75.0 3 37.5 9 56.3 5 62.5 2 25
P value p = 0.837 p = 0.162 p = 0.375
2 • Nonfilled 8 100 7 87.5 15 93.8 1 12.5 - -
• Gutta-percha 5 62.5 6 75 11 68.8 2 25 3 37.5
• Post 6 75.0 2 25 8 50 6 75 2 25
P value p = 0.304 p = 0.056 p = 0.030
3 • Nonfilled 7 87.5 7 87.5 14 87.5 1 12.5 1 12.5
• Gutta-percha 6 75 7 87.5 13 81.3 1 12.5 2 25
• Post 5 62.5 3 37.5 8 50 5 62.5 3 37.5
P value p = 0.837 p = 0.062 p = 0.075