Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 6;4(7):e12762. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12762

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Adaptation of the pulse response across multiple odor pulse intensities. (A) The mean LFP peak pulse response curves (N = 5–9 cells, 3–21 trials per cell) for each background odor intensity calculated using the normalization procedure. Error bars indicate Standard error of the means (SEMs), propagated from paired data (Methods). (B) As in panel A, but using ORN spike rate data. (C) As in panel A, but using PN synaptic potential data (N = 5–9 cells, 3–10 trials per cell). (D) As in panel A, but using PN spike rate data. E‐G. Output of each stage plotted as a function of its input to assess the adaptation at a given stage. E. ORN LFP (Y‐values from panel A) plotted against ORN spikes (Y‐values from panel B), reflecting ORN spike generation F, ORN spikes (Y‐values from panel B) plotted against PN synaptic potential (Y‐values from panel C), reflecting the glomerular transform. Only responses to the same pulse value were plotted. The inset shows the average ORN spike pulse responses from the points within the dashed box. G, PN synaptic potential (Y‐values from panel C) plotted against PN spikes (Y‐values from panel D), reflecting PN spike generation.