Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 28;20(5):903–908. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12773

Table 1.

Logistic regression analysis of associations between the genotypes of XPG and stomach cancer susceptibility in a Chinese population

Genotype Cases (N = 692) Controls (N = 771) P a Crude OR (95% CI) P Adjusted OR (95% CI)b P b
rs2094258 C>T
CC 287 (41.47) 291 (37.74) 0.296c 1.00 1.00
CT 304 (43.93) 368 (47.73) 0.84 (0.67–1.05) 0.119 0.85 (0.68–1.06) 0.150
TT 101 (14.60) 112 (14.53) 0.91 (0.67–1.25) 0.577 0.92 (0.67–1.26) 0.601
Additive 0.93 (0.80–1.08) 0.313 0.93 (0.80–1.08) 0.347
Dominant 405 (58.53) 480 (62.26) 0.145d 0.86 (0.69–1.06) 0.145 0.86 (0.70–1.07) 0.177
Recessive 591 (85.40) 659 (85.47) 0.970e 1.01 (0.75–1.35) 0.970 1.00 (0.75–1.35) 0.980
rs751402 C>T
CC 286 (41.33) 351 (45.53) 0.227c 1.00 1.00
CT 313 (45.23) 331 (42.93) 1.16 (0.93–1.45) 0.184 1.17 (0.91–1.49) 0.221
TT 93 (13.44) 89 (11.54) 1.28 (0.92–1.78) 0.140 1.11 (0.77–1.61) 0.576
Additive 1.14 (0.98–1.33) 0.088 1.09 (0.92–1.29) 0.335
Dominant 406 (58.67) 420 (54.47) 0.106d 1.19 (0.96–1.46) 0.106 1.15 (0.92–1.45) 0.226
Recessive 599 (86.56) 682 (88.46) 0.273e 1.19 (0.87–1.62) 0.272 1.03 (0.73–1.46) 0.872
rs2296147 T>C
TT 442 (63.87) 475 (61.61) 0.464c 1.00 1.00
CT 217 (31.36) 264 (34.24) 0.88 (0.71–1.10) 0.273 0.93 (0.73–1.19) 0.562
CC 33 (4.77) 32 (4.15) 1.11 (0.67–1.83) 0.688 1.38 (0.78–2.44) 0.268
Additive 0.95 (0.80–1.14) 0.586 1.03 (0.84–1.25) 0.809
Dominant 250 (36.13) 296 (38.39) 0.371d 0.91 (0.73–1.12) 0.372 0.97 (0.77–1.23) 0.823
Recessive 659 (95.23) 739 (95.85) 0.567e 1.16 (0.70–1.90) 0.566 1.41 (0.81–2.48) 0.227
rs873601G>A
GG 172 (24.86) 205 (26.59) 0.087c 1.00 1.00
GA 333 (48.12) 396 (51.36) 1.00 (0.78–1.29) 0.986 1.08 (0.81–1.42) 0.604
AA 187 (27.02) 170 (22.05) 1.31 (0.98–1.75) 0.067 1.33 (0.96–1.84) 0.086
Additive 1.14 (0.99–1.32) 0.071 1.15 (0.98–1.36) 0.088
Dominant 520 (75.14) 566 (73.41) 0.449d 1.10 (0.87–1.39) 0.450 1.15 (0.89–1.50) 0.287
Recessive 505 (72.98) 601 (77.95) 0.027e 1.31 (1.03–1.66) 0.027 1.27 (0.97–1.65) 0.084
Combined effect of risk genotypes
0 145 (20.95) 200 (25.94) 0.023c 1.00 1.00
1 367 (53.03) 408 (52.92) 1.24 (0.96–1.60) 0.099 1.20 (0.90–1.60) 0.211
2 180 (26.01) 163 (21.14) 1.52 (1.13–2.06) 0.006 1.44 (1.03–2.01) 0.035
0 145 (20.95) 200 (25.94) 1.00 1.00
1–2 547 (79.05) 571 (74.06) 0.025 1.32 (1.04–1.69) 0.025 1.27 (0.97–1.66) 0.088
a

Chi‐squared test for genotype distributions between stomach cancer cases and controls.

b

Adjusted for age, gender, BMI, smoking and drinking status.

c

Additive models.

d

Dominant models.

e

Recessive models.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

The results were in bold, if the 95% CI excluded 1 or P<0.05.