Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 20;129(8):992–999. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.179803

Table 4.

Comparison of HT and sequential therapy in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

First author, year Region Centers (n) Duration Cases (n) Cure rate of ITT (%) Cure rate of PP (%) Compliance (%) Overall rate of adverse effects (%) Discontinued medication due to adverse effects (%)
Hsu, 2011[6,16] Taiwan, China 3 14d HT 117 97.4 99.1* 94.9 14.5 4.3
14d ST 123 91.9 93.9 95.9 21.1 3.3
Sardarian, 2013[17] Iran 1 14d HT 210 89.5* 92.9* 96.7 28.1 1.4
10d ST 210 76.7 79.9 98.6 24.8 0.5
Zullo, 2013[18] Italy 3 14d HT 90 80.0 85.7 93.3 24.4 6.7
10d ST 90 91.1 92.1 98.9 18.9 1.1
Oh, 2014[11] Korea 1 14d HT 90 81.1 85.9 97.7 33.7 3.5
14d ST 94 79.8 82.0 95.7 39.8 3.2
De Francesco, 2014[19] Italy 1 14d HT 110 82.7 95.8 NR 22.7 6.4
10d ST 110 90.0 94.3 NR 19.1 2.7
Chen, 2015[8] Taiwan, China 1 14d HT 88 92.0* 96.4* 97.7 59.1 2.3
10d ST 87 78.2 81.9 97.6 69.0 2.3
Pooled-data analysis HT 705 87.8 (619/705) 93.0 (608/654) 96.1 (566/589) 29.1 (204/701) 3.7 (26/701)
ST 714 83.8 (598/714) 86.6 (589/680) 97.5 (586/601) 29.9 (213/713) 2.0 (14/713)

*P<0.05: HT versus ST. CT: Concomitant therapy; HT: Hybrid therapy; ITT: Intention-to-treat; NR: Not reported; PP: Per-protocol; ST: Sequential therapy; d: Days.