Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 20;129(8):992–999. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.179803

Table 5.

Comparison of HT and CT in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

First author, year Region Center (n) Duration Cases (n) Cure rate of ITT (%) Cure rate of PP (%) Compliance (%) Overall rate of adverse effects (%) Discontinued medication due to adverse effects (n)
Molina-Infante, 2013[10] Spain/Italy 4 14d HT 171 90.0 92.0 98.8 47.0 2.4
14d CT 172 91.8 96.2 95.2 56.0 6.0
Zullo, 2013[18] Italy 3 14d HT 90 80.0 85.7 93.3 24.4 6.7
5d CT 90 85.6 91.7 93.3 30.0 6.7
De Francesco, 2014[19] Italy 1 14d HT 110 82.7 95.8* NR 22.7 6.4
5d CT 110 78.2 85.1 NR 24.5 5.5
14d CT 110 86.4 95.0 NR 26.4 7.3
Cuadrado-Lavín, 2015[13] Spain 3 10d HT 120 90.8 93.9 98.3 67.5 1.7
10d CT 120 89.9 90.3 96.7 65.8 5.0
Heo, 2015[14] Korea 6 10d HT 241 78.8 89.6 95.0 NR 0
10d CT 238 78.6 89.9 90.1 NR 3.2
Pooled-data analysis HT 732 84.1 (615/731) 91.4 (602/659) 96.5 (577/598) 42.4 (207/488) 2.7 (19/703)
CT 840 84.6 (708/837) 91.5 (686/750) 93.3 (559/599) 42.8 (255/596) 5.3 (43/818)

*P<0.05: 14d HT versus 5d CT; P<0.05: 10d HT versus 10d CT. CT: Concomitant therapy; HT: Hybrid therapy; ITT: Intention-to-treat; NR: Not reported; PP: Per-protocol; ST: Sequential therapy; TT: Triple therapy; d: Days.