Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 7;172(5):1384–1394. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13443

Table 2.

Summary of improvements from baseline to months 4 and 6 for idiopathic hypotrichosis and chemotherapy‐induced hypotrichosis subpopulations: efficacy end points based on Global Eyelash Assessment (GEA) and/or Eyelash Satisfaction Questionnaire (ESQ) scores (intent‐to‐treat population)

Efficacy end point Time point Idiopathic hypotrichosis bimatoprost (= 179) treatment responders Idiopathic hypotrichosis vehicle (= 59) treatment responders P‐value
Composite end point: ≥ 1‐grade increase in GEA score and ≥ 3‐point improvement in ESQ Domain 2 Month 4a 72 (40·2) 4 (6·8) < 0·01
Month 6 85 (47·5) 2 (3·4) < 0·01
≥ 1‐grade increase in GEA Month 4 133 (74·3) 8 (13·6) < 0·01
Month 6 139 (77·7) 8 (13·6) < 0·01
≥ 3‐point increase in ESQ Domain 2 Month 4 85 (47·5) 9 (15·3) < 0·01
Month 6 100 (55·9) 9 (15·3) < 0·01
≥ 2‐grade increase in GEA Score Month 4 46 (25·7) 0 (0·0) < 0·01
Month 6 55 (30·7) 0 (0·0) < 0·01
Efficacy end pointa Time point Chemotherapy‐induced hypotrichosis patients receiving bimatoprost (= 96) treatment responders Chemotherapy‐induced hypotrichosis patients receiving vehicle (= 34) treatment responders P‐valueb
Composite end point: ≥ 1‐grade increase in GEA score and ≥ 3‐point improvement in ESQ Domain 2 Month 4a 36 (37·5) 6 (18·2)c 0·04
Month 6 45 (46·9) 6 (18·2)c < 0·01
≥ 1‐grade increase in GEA Month 4 70 (72·9) 18 (54·5)c 0·05
Month 6 77 (80·2) 17 (51·5)c < 0·01
≥ 3‐point increase in ESQ Domain 2 Month 4 39 (40·6) 8 (24·2)c 0·09
Month 6 46 (47·9) 12 (36·4)c 0·25
≥ 2‐grade increase in GEA score Month 4 35 (36·5) 2 (6·1)c < 0·01
Month 6 44 (45·8) 3 (9·1)c < 0·01

Values are given as n (%). Bimatoprost, bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0·03%. aMonth 4 is the primary analysis time point. bA Pearson's χ2 test was performed; if ≥ 25% of the cells had expected counts < 5, then Fisher's exact test was used instead. cOverall population of patients with chemotherapy‐induced hypotrichosis receiving vehicle was 33.