Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 7;172(5):1384–1394. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13443

Table 3.

Percentage improvement from baseline at months 4 and 6 for idiopathic hypotrichosis and chemotherapy‐induced hypotrichosis subpopulations: efficacy end points based on eyelash characteristics (intent‐to‐treat population)

Efficacy end pointb Time point Idiopathic hypotrichosisa Chemotherapy‐induced hypotrichosisa
Bimatoprost (= 179) Vehicle (= 59) P‐valuec Bimatoprost (= 96) Vehicle (= 34) P‐valuec
Upper eyelash length (mm) Month 4 22·9 (177) −4·9 (58) < 0·01 28·5 (94) 11·3 (31) 0·02
Month 6 26·0 (177) −1·0 (58) < 0·01 37·8 (94) 16·3 (31) < 0·01
Upper eyelash thickness (mm2) Month 4 95·9 (150) −7·2 (52) < 0·01 180·1 (64) 25·0 (19) < 0·01
Month 6 91·4 (150) −7·7 (52) < 0·01 245·9 (64) 33·3 (19) < 0·01
Upper eyelash darkness (intensity units)d Month 4 −15·7 (150) 1·4 (52) < 0·01 −14·4 (65) −5·7 (18) 0·01
Month 6 −14·1 (150) 1·6 (52) < 0·01 −16·3 (65) −6·5 (18) < 0·01

Values are given as % (n). Bimatoprost, bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0·03%. aMean values are presented for the idiopathic hypotrichosis subpopulation. The median is reported for the chemotherapy‐induced hypotrichosis subpopulation where the distribution of the values is skewed with a small number of very high values in percentage change from baseline from those patients who had very few or no eyelashes at baseline. bMonth 4 is the primary analysis time point. c P‐value for between‐group comparison is based on Wilcoxon rank‐sum test. dA negative change from baseline indicates darker eyelashes compared with baseline.