Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 7;172(5):1384–1394. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13443

Table 5.

Summary of efficacy results for patients with idiopathic hypotrichosis treated with bimatoprost in treatment period 1 and switched to vehicle in treatment period 2 (intent‐to‐treat population)

Efficacy variable)/visita Treatment Primary composite end point (= 60) ≥ 1‐grade improvement from baseline GEA score (= 60) ≥ 3‐point improvement from baseline ESQ Domain 2 score (= 60) ≥ 2‐grade improvement from baseline GEA score (= 60)
Month 1 Bimatoprost 0 (0·0) 6 (10·0) 8 (13·3) 0 (0·0)
Month 2 8 (13·3) 24 (40·0) 15 (25·0) 2 (3·3)
Month 4 25 (41·7) 43 (71·7) 29 (48·3) 15 (25·0)
Month 6 29 (48·3) 46 (76·7) 34 (56·7) 18 (30·0)
Month 7 Vehicle 31 (51·7) 47 (78·3) 34 (56·7) 18 (30·0)
Month 8 30 (50·0) 47 (78·3) 33 (55·0) 17 (28·3)
Month 10 12 (20·0) 28 (46·7) 26 (43·3) 5 (8·3)
Month 12 7 (11·7) 21 (35·0) 23 (38·3) 3 (5·0)

Values given as n (%). Bimatoprost, bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0·03%; GEA, Global Eyelash Assessment; ESQ, Eyelash Satisfaction Questionnaire. aVisit was based on visit window. Baseline was defined as the most recent evaluation prior to day 1. Last observation carried forward was performed.