Table 4.

Males odds ratios comparing multiple-risk drinkers, moderate-risk drinkers, and binge-drinkers to the low-risk drinkers or abstainers.

	Multiple-risk drinkers vs. low-risk drinkers or abstainers		Moderate-risk drinkers vs. low-risk drinkers or abstainers		Binge drinkers vs. low-risk drinkers or abstainers
	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Hispanic	0.53	[021–1.34]	1.38	[0.81–2.35]	0.72	[0.42–1.24]
White	2 81***	[1.42–5.57]	1.60***	[1.02–2.53]	0.67*	[0.46–0.97]
Wave 3 age	0.88	[0.71–1.09]	0.88	[0.70–1.10]	1.08	[0.91–1.29]
Wave 3 education	1.02	[0.83–1.26]	1.02	[0.83–1.26]	0.70**	[0.56–0.88]
Wave 3 single	5.56***	[2.86–10.81]	1.72*	[1.01–2.94]	0.81	[0.55–1.19]
Wave 3 live with  parent(s)	0.46***	[0.30–0.69]	1.08	[0.72–1.64]	1.48*	[1.01–2.16]
Wave 3 child  supervisory  neglect	2.16*	[1.11–4.21]	0.93	[0.44–1.99]	1.22	[0.68–2.20]
Wave 1 parental  drinking	0.74	[0.41–1.33]	1.61*	[1.02–2.54]	1.30	[0.77–2.19]
Wave 3 depression	1.36**	[1.11–1.68]	1.44***	[1.18–1.76]	1.19	[0.99–1.43]
Wave 1  delinquency	1 92***	[1.53–2.41]	1.34**	[1.10–1.63]	0.79	[0.58–1.07]

^*p < 0.05,

^**p < 0.01,

^***p <0.001.

Note. Low-risk drinkers or abstainers are the referent for multiple-risk drinkers, moderate-risk drinkers, and binge-drinkers. Hispanic was equal to 1 for individuals who responded yes to a question asking if they were of Hispanic decent and zero for those who responded no. Thus, the referent group for Hispanics was non-Hispanics. Because of their low substance use during emerging adulthood, white was given a value of 1 and the referent group contained individuals who identified as Asian/Pacific Islander, black and other.