Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 28;107(4):491–498. doi: 10.1111/cas.12897

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analysis for breast cancer specific survival in ER+/HER2− breast cancer patients

Univariate Mutivariate
P‐value HR 95% CI P‐value HR 95% CI
FGFR1 amplification Normal
a: normal versus 0.92 0.90 0.048–5.09 0.74 0.65 0.026–6.02
b: Gain/amplification Gain/amplification
FGFR1 mRNA expression
a: low Low versus high 0.51 0.59 0.086–2.63 0.46 0.49 0.045–3.01
b: high
FGFR1 protein expression
a: low Low versus high 0.70 1.33 0.27–5.43 0.31 2.50 0.40–14.63
b: high
Age
a: <50 <50 vs ≥50 0.93 0.93 0.21–6.34 0.77 0.59 0.022–14.32
b: ≥50
Menstrual status
a: premenopause Pre versus post 0.83 1.19 0.27–8.13 0.69 2.09 0.10–75.83
b: postmenopause
BMI
a: <23 <23 vs ≥23 0.27 2.20 0.54–10.76 0.082 4.65 0.82–40.62
b: ≥23
Nuclear grade
a: 1 1 vs 2, 3 0.16 2.72 0.67–13.30 0.86 1.16 0.22–6.72
b: 2, 3
Tumor invasion size ≤20 mm
a: ≤20 mm vs 0.32 2.04 0.50–9.93 0.72 1.38 0.26–10.53
b: >20 mm >20 mm
Nodal status
a: + + vs 0.032* 4.97 1.14–33.95 0.018* 9.87 1.43–201.32
b: −
Ki67
a: <15% <15% vs ≥15% 0.14 3.91 0.67–73.92 0.42 2.37 0.33–47.96
b: ≥15%

2 test: P < 0.05; CI, confidence interval; ER+/HER2−, estrogen receptor‐positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2‐negative; FGFR1, fibroblast growth factor receptor‐1; HR, hazard ratio.