Table 2.
Study 1 19 (n = 74) | Study 2 23 (n = 10*) | Study 3 24 (n = 30) | Study 4 (n = 19) | Study 5 (n = 8) | Total (n = 133) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M/F | 66/8 | 9/1* | 28/2 | 15/4 | 6/2 | 117/17 |
Age (years) | 61 [27–83] | 52 [37–69] | 56 [27–82] | 63 [34–82] | 62 [47–68] | 60 [27–83] |
Weight (kg) | 95 [51–171] | 92 [51–126] | 93 [63–162] | 88 [53–134] | 102 [73–156] | 94 [51–171] |
European ancestry | 60 | 8* | 20 | 17 | 5 | 104 |
Maori/PI | 14 | 2* | 8 | 2 | 3 | 27 |
East Asian ancestry ‡ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
South Asian ancestry ‡ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
CLcr (ml min−1) | 68 [12–123] | 80 [63–105] | 67 [53–125] | 60 [33–102] | 52 [23–78] | 68 [12–125] |
Diuretics (n [%]) | 25 [34%] | 0* | 9 [30%] | 4 [21%] | 6 [75%] | 44 [33%] |
β‐adrenoceptor blockers (n [%]) | 35 [47%] | 1* [10%] | 8 [27%] | 8 [42%] | 3 [38%] | 54 [41%] |
ACEI (n [%]) | 28 [38%] | 3* [30 5] | 14 [47%] | 6 [32%] | 3 [38%] | 52 [39%] |
ARBs (n [%]) | 9 [12%] | 2* [20%] | 2 [7%] | 0 | 2 [25%] | 13 [10%] |
CCBs (n [%]) | 17 [23%] | 3* [30%] | 4 [14%] | 2 [11%] | 3 [38%] | 26 [20%] |
Statins (n [%]) | 34 [46%] | 5* [50%] | 10 [33%] | 6 [20%] | 4 [50%] | 54 [41%] |
NSAIDs (n [%]) | 12 [16%] | 3* [30%] | 5 [17%] | – | – | 17 [13%] |
Uricosuric (n [%]) | 1 [1.4%] | – | 3 [10%] | – | – | 4 [3%] |
Daily dose (mg) | 300 [50–600] | 350 [150–500] | 200 [50–500] | 100 [50–300] | 250 [50–700] | 300 [50–700] |
Oxypurinol (μmol l−1) | 114 [15–427] | 83 [26–138] | 57 [0–198] | 11 [0–50] | 208 [77–401] | 72 [26–427] |
Urate (mmol l−1) | 0.32 [0.18–0.68] | 0.31 [0.20–0.44] | 0.41 [0.27–0.63] | 0.49 [0.28–0.69] | 0.42 [0.30–0.89] | 0.38 [0.18–0.89] |
All data are expressed as median [range] unless otherwise stated. ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; CCBs, calcium channel blockers; CLcr, creatinine clearance; M/F, male/female; NSAID, regular use of a non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug; PI, Pacific Islander; statin, HMG‐CoA reductase inhibitors.
8 of the 10 patients also participated in the dose‐escalation study (individuals were included once in the total counts);
the subject of Eastern Asian ancestry was Korean, the subject of Southern Asian ancestry was Indian.