Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 15;81(2):235–245. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12787

Table 3.

Geometric mean ratio and 90% CI for comparison of oral capsule vs. i.v. formulation of ibrutinib (treatment A ‐fasted, treatment B‐ fed without grapefruit juice, and treatment C ‐ fed with grapefruit juice) (pharmacokinetics data analysis set, dose‐normalized to 560 mg)

Parameter* Ibrutinib test treatment/reference treatment N Geometric mean Ratio: test/reference (%) 90% confidence interval (%) Intra‐participant CV (%)
Treatment A
AUClast (ng h ml–1) Oral 8 264 2.9 (2.12, 3.94) 36.5
i.v. 8 9134
AUC (ng h ml–1) Oral 3 330 3.9 (3.06, 5.02) 10.4
i.v. 3 8421
Treatment B
AUClast (ng h ml–1) Oral 8 588 7.6 (6.41, 9.03) 18.2
i.v. 8 7726
AUC (ng h ml–1) Oral 6 666 8.4 (7.32, 9.68) 12.1
i.v. 6 7918
Treatment C
AUClast (ng h ml–1) Oral 8 1236 15.8 (11.93, 20.79) 29.9
i.v. 8 7847
AUC (ng h ml–1) Oral 8 1270 15.9 (12.07, 20.89) 29.6
i.v. 8 8001

AUC = area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time zero to infinite time, calculated as the sum of AUClast and Clastz; AUClast = area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration;

*

AUC22