Table 2.
Outcomes (df) | Node 1 | Node 2 | Node 3 | Node 4 |
AGN omission positive stimuli (1,323) | n.s. | 0.0090 (−0.09)*† | n.s. | n.s. |
AGN omission negative stimuli (1,323) | n.s. | 0.0014 (−0.11)* | 0.0026 (−0.11)* | 0.0038 (−0.10)* |
SWM between search errors (1,495) | 0.0001 (−0.12)*† | 0.0003 (−0.11)* | 0.0007 (−0.09)* | 0.0004 (−0.11)* |
Delay discounting (small reward; 1,507) | 0.0461 (−0.08)*† | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
Delay discounting (medium reward; 1,507) | 0.0209 (−0.08)*† | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
Delay discounting (large reward; 1,507) | n.s. | n.s. | 0.0190 (−0.08)*† | n.s. |
The P values corrected for multiple testing were calculated based on 10,000 permutation analyses. AGN, affective go/no go; n.s., no significance; SWM, spatial working memory.
Results were provided as P value (partial correlation, i.e., the effect size).
A node was classed as predominant if its P value after controlling for all other nodes was smaller than 0.10 (Table S3). Study sites, gender, and handedness were controlled.