Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 2;113(14):3740–3745. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524109113

Table 1.

TH and IRI activity of AFPs from nanoliter cryoscopy, sonocrystallization, and optical microscopy measurements

AFP Ice crystal-binding plane THnano/C, °C⋅mM−1/2 THsono/C, °C⋅mM−1/2 Ci, μM
rQAE {101¯0} primary prism and {202¯1} pyramidal planes (39) 0.90 0.91 5.9
AFGP1–5 {101¯0} primary prism planes (40, 41) 0.78 0.48 0.00091
MpAFP prism and basal planes (42) 20.8 0.85 0.011
DAFP-1 prism and basal planes (43) 19.8 0.32 2.1
ssAFP1 {112¯0} secondary prism planes (13) 0.57 0.13 n.d.
wfAFP1 {202¯1} pyramidal planes (13) 0.48 0.07 5.8

The ratio TH/C is used as a quantitative measure of TH activity. It corresponds to the slope of the curve that describes TH as a function of the square root of the protein concentration as illustrated in Fig. 2C. Ci is the IRI efficacy and represents the inhibitor concentration determined from the inflection point of a curve of the recrystallization constant kd vs. CAFP (Fig. S7) (21, 22). The tabulated cryoscopy values are from this work for rQAE, AFGP1–5, and DAFP-1 and from literature for wfAFP1 (44), MpAFP (45), and ssAFP1 (46). Boldfaced show the two AFPs with the highest measured activity for a particular activity assay.