Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Feb 27;264:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.02.016

Table 1.

Confusion matrix comparing human scoring against MCS with no rejections. The numbers displayed in the main table are percentages of epochs in a recording. For example, on average 1.10% of epochs in a recording were labeled as NREM by the human but as Wake by MCS. Precision is presented below the main table, and sensitivity is presented to the right of the main table. Overall accuracy is displayed in the bottom-right cell.

MCS – No rejections
Wake NREM REM Rejections Sensitivity
Human Wake 53.61 1.95 0.54 0 0.96
NREM 1.10 37.96 0.54 0 0.96
REM 0.48 0.31 3.52 0 0.82
Precision 0.97 0.94 0.77 - 0.95