Table 11.
Types of standard gap feedback from MFS
| Milestones/ trajectory/ expected outcomea |
Norms unspecifiedb |
Clinical normsc |
Local normsd |
Matched/ specifiede |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACORN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| AKQUASI | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ALERT | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Assessment Center | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BASIS-24 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| BIMAS | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| BPM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| CHES | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| CORE | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| EAS-C | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Intra/Compass | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| MHITS | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| My Outcomes | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| OQ Measures | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Owl Outcomes | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Penelope | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Polaris-BH | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Polaris-CD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| The Schwartz Outcome Monitoring | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| TOP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| TPI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| VitalHealth | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total (%) systems that provide standardized feedback in the specified wayf | 8 (16.3) | 4 (8.2) | 13 (26.5) | 2 (4.1) | 4 (8.2) |
Note. Only MFS that possess the capability "provides standard gap feedbacks" were included in the table. Systems that do not have information in the table, did not include details about the specific standard gap feedback coded in their materials
a
Comparison of service recipient progress to expected progress through treatment
b
Comparison of service recipient to unspecified norms, could be clinical or local
c
Comparison to published norms and clinical cut off scores for a measure
d
Comparison to other service recipients in the same area or system
e
Comparison to other service recipients with similar diagnoses, baseline scores or symptom severity
f
Percentages calculated based on total number of systems (N=49)