Table 12.

Type and delivery mode of alerts to providers

	Types of alerts					Delivery mode of alert
System	High risk/critical itemsa	Workflow or case managementb	Measure completion (or lack of)c	Gradations in improvement or declined		Cue/ reminder/ flage	Dashboard/ console/reportf	Colors/ highlightingg	Emailsh
AKQUASI	0	0	0	0		0	0	1	1
ALERT	1	0	0	0		0	0	0	0
BPM	0	0	1	0		0	0	0	1
Carepaths	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0
Centervention	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0
CHADIS	0	1	0	0		1	1	0	0
CMTS	1	1	0	0		1	0	0	0
CORE	1	1	0	0		1	0	0	0
FAS	1	0	0	0		0	1	0	0
MHITS	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0
Mobile Therapy	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0
My Outcomes	1	0	1	1		0	1	1	0
OQ Measures	1	0	1	1		0	1	1	0
Outcome Tracker	0	1	0	0		0	0	0	0
Penelope	0	1	0	0		0	0	0	1
Polaris-BH	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0
Polaris-CD	1	0	0	0		1	0	0	0
Therapy Rewind	0	0	0	0		1	0	0	0
TOMS	0	1	0	0		0	0	0	0
TOP	1	0	0	0		0	0	0	0
VitalHealth	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0
Total (%) systems that give alerts to providers in the specified wayi	8 (16.3)	6 (12.2)	3 (6.1)	2 (4.1)	0	5 (10.2)	4 (8.2)	3 (6.1)	3 (6.1)

Note. Only MFS that possess the capability "provides standard gap feedbacks" were included in the table. Systems that do not have information in the table, did not include details about the specific alerts coded in their materials

^aAlerts provider when the service recipient endorses suicidality or other critical items on a measure

^bAlerts providers of specific tasks they must complete

^cAlerts provider when service recipient fails to complete a measure assigned to him/her

^dAlerts provider of service recipient improvement or decline based on a specific measure

^eInformation is brought to the provider’s attention via a cue, flag or reminder

^fInformation is brought to provider’s attention in the dashboard, console, or report

^gInformation is brought to the provider’s attention using specific colors or highlights

^hInformation is brought to the provider’s attention via email

ⁱPercentages calculated based on total number of systems (N=49)