Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Mar 10;264:136–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.02.021

Fig. 5. Performance of a simple depletion model in comparison to train, EQ, and decay methods.

Fig. 5

Data from many cells stimulated with 100 Hz trains in various recording conditions (same dataset as Figs. 2 and 3). A. Plot of RRPtrain normalized to RRPNpRf as a function of pNpRf, n=122. B. Plot of RRPEQ normalized to RRPNpRf as a function of pNpRf, n=107. C. Plot of RRPdecay normalized to RRPNpRf as a function of pNpRf, n=121. D. Plot of ptrain normalized to pNpRf as a function of pNpRf, n=122. E. dPlot of pEQ normalized to pNpRf as a function of pNpRf, n=107. F. Plot of pdecay normalized to pNpRf as a function of pNpRf, n=121.