Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Psychol. 2016 Feb 11;35(5):442–453. doi: 10.1037/hea0000298

Table 4.

Mixed effects linear regression models of the association between survey wave, depressive symptoms, and responses to health warning labels among smokers, International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey, Mexico, 2010–2011, weighted estimates

Model 1
Bivariate
Model 2
Main Effect Model
Model 3
Interaction Model
b (SE) b (SE) b (SE)
Attention to HWLs
Survey wave
 4 - - -
 5 0.15*** (0.03) 0.16*** (0.03) 0.18*** (0.04)
Depressive symptoms
 Low - - -
 Elevated 0.13** (0.04) 0.15** (0.04) 0.19** (0.05)
Survey wave X depressive symptoms −0.09 (0.08)
Cognitive response to HWLs
Survey wave
 4 - - -
 5 0.21*** (0.03) 0.23*** (0.03) 0.25*** (0.04)
Depressive symptoms
 Low - - -
 Elevated 0.21*** (0.05) 0.22*** (0.04) 0.27*** (0.06)
Survey wave X depressive symptoms −0.12 (0.09)
Awareness of tobacco constituents contained on HWLs
Survey wave
 4 - - -
 5 0.49*** (0.05) 0.50*** (0.05) 0.55*** (0.05)
Depressive symptoms
 Low - - -
 Elevated 0.07 (0.07) 0.17* (0.07) 0.33** (0.09)
Survey wave X depressive symptoms −0.36* (0.15)

Note. n=1340 individuals, n=2680 observations. HWLs – Health warning labels. The cut off point for low DS versus elevated DS was ≥ 7 at both waves using the CES-D7 scale. All main effect and interaction models adjust for age, sex, educational attainment, monthly household income, cigarettes per day, quit intention, quit attempt, and time in sample.

*

p<.05;

**

p<.01;

***

p<.001