Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 14.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Genet. 2015 Oct 14;46:114–123. doi: 10.1007/s10519-015-9758-y

Table 1.

IGEMS studies

Study Label Reference N
subjects
Age
range
Vars
Finnish Twin Cohort FTC Kaprio and
Koskenvuo
(2002)
7870 53-67 SRH
Finntwin16 FT16 Kaprio,
Pulkkinen, and
Rose (2002)
4246 21-29 SRH
Longitudinal Study of Aging
Danish Twins
LSADT Christensen,
Holm, McGue,
Corder, and
Vaupel (1999)
3311 70-102 SRH
COMP
ACT
Middle-Age Danish Twins MADT Osler et al. (2008) 4037 45-68 SRH
COMP
ACT
Midlife in the United States MIDUS South and
Krueger (2012)
1764 25-74 SRH
COMP
ACT
Minnesota Twin Study of
Adult Development and
Aging
MTSADA Finkel and McGue
(1993)
835 25-92 COMP
ACT
Origins of Variance in the
Oldest-Old
OCTO-
Twin
McClearn et al.
(1997)
666 79-98 SRH
COMP
ACT
Swedish Adoption Twin
Study of Aging
SATSA Finkel and
Pedersen (2004)
1711 26-93 SRH
COMP
ACT
Twin and Offspring Study in
Sweden
TOSS Neiderheiser and
Lichtenstein
(2008)
1069 32-60 SRH
COMP
ACT
Vietnam Era Twin Study of
Aging
VETSA Kremen et al.
(2006)
1070 51-60 SRH
COMP
ACT

Note: SRH – self-rated health; COMP = health compared with others; ACT = health influences activities