Table 2.
Entity | N | With EH (%) | Remarks | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
FLFSNHL | 1 | 1 (100 %) | [73] | |
8 | 6 (80 %) | [74] | ||
56 ears | 38 cochlear EH, 44 vestibular EH | No. of patients with EH not given | [75] | |
1 | 1 (100 %) | [76] | ||
1 | 1 (100 %) | [77] | ||
3 | 3 (100 %) | [78] | ||
43 | 40 (93 %) | [28] | ||
8 | 8 (100 %) | All had EH in Cochlea and Vestibulum. The two cases with severe vestibular EH had absent VEMP | [79] | |
5 | 5 (100 %) | [80] | ||
ALFSNHL | 1 | 1 (100 %) | [81] | |
2 | 2 (100 %) | Both had EH in the apical cochlear regions | [82] | |
RPV | 64 | 31 (48 %) | All patients had horizontal Nystagmus during attacks | [83] |
3 | 0 (0 %) | [74] | ||
1 | 0 (0 %) | [84] | ||
56 | 29 cochlear EH, 47 vestibular EH | No. of patients with EH not given | [75] | |
2 | 1 (50 %) | [85] | ||
2 | 2(100 %) | EH was more pronounced in Vestibulum in all 3 cases | [78] | |
17 | 15 (88 %) | [28] | ||
SSNHL+V | 7 | 4 (57 %) | Average hearing loss was 90 dB. | [86] |
SSNHL | 8 | 2 (25 %) | EH in Cochlea and Vestibulum. MRI at 2 and 11 months after SSNHL. Interpreted as DEH cases | [87] |
4 | 0 (0 %) | [74] | ||
1 | 0 (0 %) | HL was 68 dB | [85] | |
hSCC malformation | 11 | 9 (82 %) | 6 cases had severe EH | [88] |
DEH | 11 | 8 | [74] | |
7 | 7 (100 %) | Most had EH in both Cochlea and Vestibulum | [89] | |
2 | 2 (100 %) | [82] | ||
1 | 1 (100 %) | [85] | ||
5 | 5 (100 %) | [90] | ||
2 | 2 (100 %) | [80] | ||
VS | 13 | 4 (31 %) | Only the vestibulum could be analyzed | [91] |
LVAS | 1 | 1 (100 %) | [85] |
N number of patients, FLSNHL Fluctuating low frequency sensorineural hearing loss, ALFSNHL acute low frequency sensorineural hearing loss, RPV recurrent peripheral vestibulopathy, SSNHL+V sudden sensorineural hearing loss with vertigo, SSNHL sudden sensorineural hearing loss, hSCC horizontal semicircular canal, DEH delayed endolymphatic hydrops, VS vestibular schwannoma, LVAS large vestibular aquaeduct syndrome