Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 5;128(7):859–864. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.154275

Table 2.

Comparison of nutritional status in the higher and lower transport group over time

Group Follow-up PD time (months) ALB (g/L) Hb (g/L) DPI·(g kg−1·d−1) nPNA (g·kg−1·d−1) Malnutrition by SGA

Patients Rate (%)
HT (n = 65) Initial PET 2.8 ± 1.4 34.7 ± 4.5 98 ± 10 0.84 ± 0.16 0.89 ± 0.22 24 36.9
Last follow-up 20.9 ± 13.3 34.5 ± 3.9 97 ± 11 0.88 ± 0.25 0.86 ± 0.18* 29 44.6
LT (n = 37) Initial PET 2.6 ± 1.4 35.9 ± 5.9 98 ± 11 0.94 ± 0.22 0.92 ± 0.24 11 29.7
Last follow-up 25.5 ± 14.6 37.0 ± 3.3 101 ± 9 1.04 ± 0.19 0.97 ± 0.15* 9 24.3

*P<0.05 versus before values in the same group; P<0.05 versus HT group. PET: Peritoneal equilibration test; ALB: Serum albumin; Hb: Hemoglobin; DPI: Daily protein intake; nPNA: Normalized protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance; SGA: Subjective global assessment; LT: Lower peritoneal transport group; HT: Higher peritoneal transport group; PD: Peritoneal dialysis.