Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015 Oct 17;11(8):1467–1474. doi: 10.1007/s11548-015-1295-x

Table 1.

Patient information and tumor details

No. Age (years) Sex Location
of tumor
Size (cm3) No. of points Basis Measured (mm) Predicted (mm) Error after correction
(mm)
1 19 F RT 4.8 52 Wcp 9.3 ± 1.4 (13.0) 8.6 ± 0.3 (9.2) 3.1 ± 1.4 (7.5)
2 38 F LF 1.3 13 Wcp 9.0 ± 1.6 (10.8) 8.3 ± 1.2 (9.9) 3.3 ± 1.2 (5.1)
3 63 F LT 25.1 18 C 12.8 ± 2.4 (17.7) 12.1 ± 0.9 (13.0) 4.0 ± 2.2 (8.2)
4 51 F LT 27.2 16 C 21.3 ± 3.5 (28.2) 21.1 ± 3.2 (26.1) 2.6 ± 1.1 (5.8)
5 28 F RF 7.6 11 C 11.2 ± 2.2 (14.7) 10.6 ± 1.1 (12.1) 3.3 ± 1.5 (5.2)
6 63 M LF 29.2 4 C 3.2 ± 0.9 (4.4) 3.2 ± 0.4 (3.7) 0.7 ± 0.4 (1.2)
7 68 F LT 16.1 213 Wcp 2.5 ± 1.0 (4.9) 2.0 ± 0.2 (2.5) 1.6 ± 0.8 (3.7)
8 42 F RP 100.2 20 C 7.1 ± 4.8 (22.3) 6.1 ± 4.9 (25.3) 2.5 ± 1.3 (6.7)
9 64 F RF 10.2 3 C 4.9 ± 0.2 (5.1) 4.7 ± 0.7 (5.5) 1.2 ± 0.4 (1.5)
10 84 M LF 47.3 13 C 6.8 ± 4.8 (17.0) 6.5 ± 2.2 (10.4) 3.3 ± 1.8 (7.5)
11 48 F RT 6.2 26 C 12.7 ± 2.8 (18.8) 12.7 ± 0.9 (13.6) 3.3 ± 1.3 (5.5)
12 46 M RT 56.8 17 C 15.0 ± 3.6 (22.1) 13.2 ± 3.5 (17.4) 3.7 ± 3.2 (13.6)
13 22 F LF 48.2 10 C 20.0 ± 4.3 (26.5) 18.6 ± 2.9 (21.3) 3.9 ± 2.5 (9.1)
14 58 M LP 23.1 12 C 6.3 ± 2.0 (10.3) 5.7 ± 1.1 (7.3) 1.9 ± 1.2 (4.3)
15 77 M LT 8.9 7 C 6.3 ± 0.5 (6.7) 6.1 ± 0.1 (6.3) 1.5 ± 0.7 (2.6)
16 75 F LT 21.8 22 C 13.0 ± 2.1 (15.9) 10.3 ± 0.8 (11.3) 3.7 ± 1.8 (6.9)

The measured, predicted, and corrected brain shift results (mean ± SD with maximum in parenthesis) for all 16 cases. With respect to location (L-left, R-right, T-temporal, F-frontal, P-parietal). With respect to basis, ‘C’ indicates that corresponding points drove the correction, while ‘Wcp’ indicates sparse corresponding points were used to directionally weight additional closest point distances were employed